09/08/2021 / By Ethan Huff
In a statement, U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland pledged his support for abortion, decrying the new “heartbeat” abortion law that was passed in Texas.
According to Garland, murdering unborn babies is a human right that falls under the banner of “reproductive health services,” and thus should never be impeded by any kind of government action.
In case you missed it, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott signed into a law a bill that outlaws abortion procedures in the Lone Star State after six weeks gestation. This is around the time when a baby’s heartbeat is able to be detected.
The left of course went into a tirade about the new law because it blocks women from murdering their unborn children closer to the delivery date. Garland sides with these leftist women, having threatened to sic the federal government on Texas for passing such a law.
“We will not tolerate violence against those seeking to obtain or provide reproductive health services,” Garland declared, suggesting that preventing women from murdering their unborn children is itself a form of “violence.”
“The Department will provide support from federal law enforcement when an abortion clinic or reproductive health center is under attack,” he added.
In Garland’s view, cutting off abortion services after six weeks gestation could put abortion clinics at risk of “violence,” which is why he has decided to round up the troops at the FBI to keep a close eye on the situation.
Garland’s strange and threatening language almost suggests that he might be conspiring with the FBI to stage a false flag terror attack of some kind against Texas abortion clinics, which can then be blamed on “anti-abortion extremists.”
The reason this could be the case is because the FBI has an extensive history of staging false flag events to frame political enemies while pushing an agenda. In this case, that agenda involves protecting the “right” of women to murder their unborn children.
“We have reached out to U.S. attorneys’ offices and FBI field offices in Texas and across the country to discuss our enforcement authorities,” Garland threatened.
“We will not tolerate violence against those seeking to obtain or provide reproductive health services, physical obstruction or property damage in violation of the Face Act.”
While we cannot say for certain what Garland might have planned to further his pro-abortion agenda, this is definitely something to keep a close eye on in the days to come, especially since the new Texas heartbeat law has gained widespread media attention.
Far-left extremists have demonstrated time and time again that they will stop at nothing to preserve their “right” to commit all kinds of unspeakably evil acts. Such acts usually involve destroying children, whether through LGBTQ indoctrination or flat-out murder in the womb.
“Funny how he tolerated all that nonstop violence from BLM and ANTIFA against peaceful conservative Americans,” wrote one commenter at The Gateway Pundit about Garland’s selective and politically driven approach to legal matters.
“George Orwell or Joseph Goebbels would be proud of Merrick Garland for calling the murder of babies ‘reproductive health care,'” wrote another.
Another commenter pointed out that he is truly amazed how depraved today’s liberals have become.
“The existence of bacteria is ‘evidence’ of life on Mars, but a heartbeat isn’t evidence of life in a human being,” this person wrote. “The lunatics are those who are in power, running our country into the ground and destroying everything they touch.”
The latest news about the left’s obsession with baby murder can be found at Abortions.news.
Sources for this article include:
Tagged Under: abortion, baby murder, child murder, demonic, heartbeat law, human rights, infanticide, medical violence, merrick garland, Reproductive Health Services, Texas, women's health
COPYRIGHT © 2017 INFANTICIDE.NEWS
All content posted on this site is protected under Free Speech. Infanticide.news is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Infanticide.news assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. All trademarks, registered trademarks and service marks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.