05/05/2022 / By Ethan Huff
Violence erupted in Los Angeles after pro-abortion extremists stormed the streets in response to the leaked Supreme Court plan to overturn Roe v. Wade.
According to Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) Chief Michel Moore, protesters swarmed Pershing Square and began throwing rocks at police officers. Some of them also smashed squad car windows, injuring one officer in the process.
“A segment of the group began to take the intersection,” Moore tweeted. “We attempted to communicate, clear and provide dispersal order to the group.”
“Crowd began to throw rocks and bottles at [officers],” he added. “We have one [officer] injured ([unknown] extent).”
An ambulance was called to the scene as photos and video footage of the violent incident began to circulate on social media.
Protesters were also seen toppling barriers and tagging graffiti outside the U.S. Courthouse at 350 W. 1st St. A tactical alert was issued to ensure enough resources for other service calls, though it was deactivated before 11 p.m.
Journalist Andy Ngô also tweeted about the protest, which looked a whole lot like the George Floyd riots of mid-2020.
Calling the crowd a “mob” of “far-left pro-abortion rioters,” Ngô offered his followers a breakdown of what happened, along with video footage – see below:
At the far-left pro-abortion, direct action in Los Angeles last night, protesters surrounded & threatened law enforcement trying to get them off the road. pic.twitter.com/pyRBzpygEZ
— Andy Ngô ???? (@MrAndyNgo) May 4, 2022
Los Angeles: Far-left pro-abortion protesters threaten law enforcement before back-up arrives & pushes them back. pic.twitter.com/UdswTGIR1K
— Andy Ngô ???? (@MrAndyNgo) May 4, 2022
Ian Miles Cheong also tweeted about the LAPD face-off with abortion-loving “communists,” since many in the violent mob were seen carrying communist flags.
All of this is quickly shaping up to be George Floyd 2.0, and in a mid-term election year, no less. Keep in mind that the Floyd riots also occurred during a critical election year.
“Electioneering is what Democrats call this,” wrote someone at Zero Hedge about how the leak appears staged, especially when considering the timing.
“A spontaneously (organized days ago) peaceful riot with zero consequences for the DemonRat organizers and paid ‘demonstrators,'” wrote another, adding to the sentiment. “The FBI will move in and seize all evidence and make it disappear.”
“The cops were triggered and ran away to a safe space where they could get three weeks paid leave while getting therapy in various brothels in Panama, Costa Rica and Laguna Beach,” this same commenter further joked, perhaps hitting a few more truths along the way.
Another asked why leftists in Los Angeles, which is at no risk of losing abortion services any time soon, are upset that they will not be able to get an abortion in North Dakota. And more importantly, why are they attacking local police over something the Supreme Court is slated to do at the federal level?
“That’s not the issue,” responded another. “The goal is to rally the Democratic Morons to show up in November. The election is no longer about the miserable job the Dems have been doing; it is now about Roe v. Wade. Get it?”
“To get even, the Court should release a statement that the current consensus is not to overturn R.v.W., regardless of where it really stands.”
Another made the same connection to the George Floyd riots, suggesting that those, too, were orchestrated for maximum shock factor to persuade many otherwise apathetic people to get out there and vote against Donald Trump back in 2020.
More related news about the Left’s violent reaction to the Supreme Court leak can be found at Abortions.news.
Sources include:
Tagged Under:
abortion, culture wars, domestic terrorism, fascism, George Floyd, infanticide, left cult, Leftists, Los Angeles, police, protests, riots, Roe v. Wade, Supreme Court, terrorism, violence, wokies
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
COPYRIGHT © 2017 INFANTICIDE.NEWS
All content posted on this site is protected under Free Speech. Infanticide.news is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Infanticide.news assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. All trademarks, registered trademarks and service marks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.